Information Pages

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Just In...Election Results

 
Who Won and Who Lost
2014 Primary
 

 
Results include only those contested races

REGISTRATION & TURNOUT
775,859 Registered Voters
Voting Method Total %/Reg
ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 45,807 5.90 %
EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 61,774 7.96 %
MAIL TURNOUT 14,960 1.93 %
Total 122,541 15.79 %
DEM REGISTRATION & TURNOUT
347,560 Registered Voters
Voting Method Total %/Reg
ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 17,187 4.95 %
EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 25,571 7.36 %
MAIL TURNOUT 6,375 1.83 %
Total 49,133 14.14 %
REP REGISTRATION & TURNOUT
243,079 Registered Voters
Voting Method Total %/Reg
ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 23,853 9.81 %
EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 29,550 12.16 %
MAIL TURNOUT 6,913 2.84 %
Total 60,316 24.81 %
NP REGISTRATION & TURNOUT
185,220 Registered Voters
Voting Method Total %/Reg
ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 4,767 2.57 %
EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 6,653 3.59 %
MAIL TURNOUT 1,672 0.90 %
Total 13,092 7.07 %

DEM - GOVERNOR
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Chang, Charles ''Charlie'' 3,835 8.33 %
Conquest, Frederick L. 1,323 2.87 %
Frye, Stephen H. 4,853 10.54 %
Goodman, Robert ''Bob'' 13,382 29.06 %
Hyepock, Chris 2,838 6.16 %
Rheinhart, Allen 1,958 4.25 %
Rutledge, John 3,179 6.90 %
Shabazz, Abdul H. 1,988 4.32 %
None of These Candidates 12,690 27.56 %
Total   46,046  

REP - GOVERNOR
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Hamilton, Eddie ''In Liberty'' 2,156 3.61 %
Marinch, Gary 572 0.96 %
Sandoval, Brian 53,782 90.09 %
Tarbell, William 897 1.50 %
Tighe, Thomas J. 775 1.30 %
None of These Candidates 1,516 2.54 %
Total   59,698  

DEM - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Flores, Lucy 34,184 73.74 %
Kulkin, Harley Zane 5,801 12.51 %
None of These Candidates 6,373 13.75 %
Total   46,358  

REP - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Dyer, Chris 2,838 4.77 %
Hutchison, Mark 31,463 52.90 %
Lowden, Sue 23,523 39.55 %
None of These Candidates 1,652 2.78 %
Total   59,476  
 
REP - STATE CONTROLLER
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Arlint, Cort R. 9,213 17.25 %
Herr, Barry 13,944 26.11 %
Knecht, Ron 23,420 43.86 %
None of These Candidates 6,822 12.78 %
Total   53,399  
DEM - REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS, DIST 3
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 413 of 413 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Bilbray, Erin 13,203 84.03 %
Campbell, Zachary ''Mr. Z.'' 2,510 15.97 %
Total   15,713  
 
SHERIFF
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Barboza, Angel M. 5,516 4.78 %
Burns, Larry 32,612 28.28 %
Deam, Tim 1,109 0.96 %
Gronauer, Robert ''Bobby G'' 7,300 6.33 %
Lombardo, Joe 41,809 36.26 %
Martines, Gordon 2,124 1.84 %
Moody, Ted 20,733 17.98 %
Page, Kenneth ''Nick'' 1,503 1.30 %
Roman, Bill 2,593 2.25 %
Total   115,299  

DEM - CONSTABLE, HENDERSON TOWNSHIP
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 177 of 177 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Pitts, Joe 3,017 49.72 %
Watson, Terry 3,051 50.28 %
Total   6,068  

REP - CONSTABLE, HENDERSON TOWNSHIP
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 177 of 177 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Hale, Douglas 1,122 9.98 %
Malone, Jason A. 3,057 27.20 %
Mitchell, Earl 4,762 42.36 %
Stites, John 2,300 20.46 %
Total   11,241  
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 2 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Jefferson, Phung 18,286 17.56 %
Scotti, Richard 33,464 32.14 %
Skupa, William S. ''Bill'' 25,467 24.46 %
Watkins, John G. 26,913 25.85 %
Total   104,130  
 

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 22 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Gale, Bruce L. 17,491 17.09 %
Hafter, Jacob 18,972 18.54 %
Johnson, Susan 65,891 64.38 %
Total   102,354  
 
 
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 24 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Ashby, Anthony 11,063 10.82 %
Crockett, Jim 46,366 45.34 %
Hardy, Jr., Joe 33,809 33.06 %
Liker, Tony 11,028 10.78 %
Total   102,266  
 
 
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 28 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Bush, Susan 36,787 35.40 %
Israel, Ron 56,982 54.84 %
Pool, Robert 10,143 9.76 %
Total   103,912  
 
 
DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. B
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Bezian, Ellen J. 4,441 4.40 %
Brewer, Kristine 12,704 12.60 %
Femiano, Jane D. 14,557 14.44 %
Kurtz, Thomas G. ''Tom'' 14,994 14.87 %
Marquis, Linda 19,591 19.43 %
Scalia, II, Joseph A. 16,327 16.19 %
Winesett, Shann D. 11,140 11.05 %
Zana, Heather Bailey 7,080 7.02 %
Total   100,834  

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. C
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Burton, Rebecca 34,239 34.44 %
Howard, Jr., John Hall ''Jack'' 24,001 24.15 %
Hughes, Lynn 19,862 19.98 %
Kimble-Simms, Marsha 10,688 10.75 %
Mercer, Michele ''Shell'' 10,613 10.68 %
Total   99,403  

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. J
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Hughes, Rena G. 40,089 40.72 %
Perez, Romeo R. 21,576 21.91 %
Pollock, Kenneth E. 36,790 37.37 %
Total   98,455  

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. L 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Elliott, Jennifer L. 42,476 43.83 %
Gaudet, Paul ''Mitch'' 31,232 32.23 %
Perry, Mary 23,210 23.95 %
Total   96,918  
 
 
DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. P 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Ford, David R. 24,437 25.01 %
Gibbs, Nathan 34,788 35.61 %
Pomrenze, Sandra L. 38,479 39.38 %
Total   97,704  
 
DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. T
VOTE FOR 1

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Brown, Lisa M. 36,912 37.92 %
Maskall, Maria 30,710 31.55 %
Nathan, Gayle 29,722 30.53 %
Total   97,344  
 
REGENT, STATE UNIVERSITY DISTRICT 3 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 109 of 109 (100 %)
Candidate Graph Votes %/Total
Hurst, Tom 2,428 25.08 %
Nigam, Swadeep 1,112 11.49 %
Page, Kevin J. 4,163 43.00 %
Spangelo, Bryan 1,979 20.44 %
Total   9,682  



 

No comments:

Post a Comment