Information Pages

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

A Self-Managed Restaurant Decision...A Set-Up by "The Machine"

Self-Managed Restaurant
Should  it be Tabled Following the 2020 Board Election ?
Image result for should the decision be postponed

For Full Information
Click Here


Or

Click on Our Information Page


"Nevada Know How...Archives...Page Six"


6 comments:

  1. From Barbara Sidary...to...Anthem Opinions

    We don't need a restaurant and another failure. Most of the people I know use coupons or have comps at casinos to utilize for meals. 

    I did wonder about the big push to get this proposal through the current board when we have an election coming up in 2 months. 

    Another agenda item that has not been completely thought out or transparent.

    Just look at the parking lot paving cluster. 

    Instead of doing it in thirds or fourths, they are doing it in 2 sections that will almost eliminate a good percentage of individuals not being able to utilize our clubhouses for 3 months. 

    Amazing that the city can redo a street in a week but it takes us 6 weeks for each half of the parking lot. 

    The entrance into and out of the lot is so limited that many seniors will not be able to manage it. 

    Can't imagine how many accidents we will have. 

    Many things have had to be postponed. 

    We have primary voting that will be going on during the time parking is so limited. 

    Since many of us are handicapped or just have trouble walking, it is a disaster. 

    Seems to be the norm with Sun City.  Very sad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From Veronica Savino...to...Anthem Opinions

    Why on earth would we need another restaurant? 

    I have lived here since "Trumpets". 

    It was a lovely restaurant, but couldn't make it. 

    What makes people think another restaurant would survive after so many failures?

    ReplyDelete
  3. From Patricia Yeaman...to...Anthem Opinions

    I sent this message to the restaurant email address I saw in SCA Opinions.

    I thought you would like to see what I sent and maybe share it with the community.   

    Please keep up the great work you are doing for all of us!

    When I first moved to SCA over three years ago, I was disappointed that we had no restaurant. I was in favor of adding a small coffee shop serving sandwiches, desserts, drinks, and yes, maybe some slot machines.

    After all the proposals by our Board and the lack of securing a reasonable cafe at little or no cost to the community, I totally and completely oppose the reopening of an unreasonably costly restaurant in our community! 

    The Board members who approve such investment are either independently wealthy or unbelievably stupid! 

    Listen to the majority of residents who are not willing to finance a restaurant! 

    What we desperately need in the Anthem facility is more room for card games!  Card room was severely impacted when another pool table was added, and now there is no room in the gallery to accommodate those with walkers and in wheelchairs! 

    To be truthful, it is dangerous for able bodied people to walk between the tables and chairs! 

    So enough with the unaffordable restaurant and in with more card table room!   

    ReplyDelete
  4. We will get into candidate choices, but to date, of the 7 candidates running for the Sun City Anthem Board, only 2 are opposed to a self-managed restaurant.

    Those two individuals are Forrest "Mr. Fix-It" Fetherolf and Nelson Orth.

    ReplyDelete
  5. From Bill Breier...to...Anthem Opinions

    There are communities with golf courses, but unless you pay an annual fee, you cannot use the courses.

    Often it’s several thousands of dollars plus the green fees when it is actually used. My friend  lived in a community in Florida with a restaurant however only those  residents who paid an annual fee could  patronize it (even bring a limited number of guests each year).If there are over 3500 residents in SCA that want a restaurant, as they claim a poll indicates, let those 3500+ each cough up $100.00 the first year and then there is more than the $300,000 to start up as the Board vision claims wound be needed.

    I don’t mind not being a member and not being allowed to eat there.

    If it is such a big success then I am sure there won’t be a problem getting members each year to supplement the enterprise. 

    ReplyDelete
  6. What a great idea, Bill.

    With all those who have such a dying need for a restaurant, the idea of each putting up $100 for the start-up cost, assuming half of the owners really want the restaurant, this should answer the question once and for all.

    If they do "cough up" the money, then that would prove how much they really want one, and they could prove their main point "let's try it, we have nothing to lose".

    The rest of the community could then sit back, and watch the results of their "nothing to lose" beliefs.

    How much will you "cough up" to prove your belief, Mr. Weil, Ms. Karrow, Mr. Scheutz, Mr. Coleman, Mr.Perlstein, Mr. Anterson, and Ms. Linow ...

    ...and even better, how about you all combining your assets and make up any deficient personally if you can't raise the $300,000 ?

    After all, your "expertise" surely wouldn't ever be questioned if all of you did "put your money where your mouth is" !

    ReplyDelete