Thoughts on a Restaurant
by
Forrest
Fetherolf
Position Paper 3
At this stage of our transition to self-management, a restaurant
must be considered a future consideration, not one that requires immediate
attention. We must "crawl" before we "run" in the next year for the sake of our
financial well being.
Sun City Residents have been exposed to and suffered through five
restaurant failures over our seventeen years.
Nearly a million dollars has been spent on remodeling the space
allotted to the restaurant, repairing and replacing aging and abused kitchen
equipment, and subsidizing the restaurant time and time again, to allow the
restaurant to keep the doors open.
Resident members are fed
up with the past results, and so am I.
In December 2015, the Board leadership finally threw in the towel
and negotiated a settlement whereby the restaurant would cease operation.
The actual cost of the restaurant settlement and losses SCA
incurred as a result of writing off the failed loans and unpaid utilities,
remain a mystery.
Those estimated costs are between $53,000 to $90,000 based on a financial report given during
the last monthly board meeting.
Those
substantial losses to our community are not acceptable, and will not be
tolerated if I am elected to the Board.
Good sound financial
planning must be a part of any future option, and that plan must include both
qualified advice from professionals in the restaurant industry, sound
statistical evidence, and most importantly, a vote of the members to make a
final decision.
We can no longer rely on
an informal survey that has no statistical evidence to support a successful
operation.
We live in 2016 and we
must accept that today's world has tools to determine success that far exceeded
any we had.
One option to determine
success would be to hire a professional organization to do statistical studies
examining various options we have available. If the studies are found to have
merit, they would be explored by the General Manager. "Winging it" has produced
failure in the past, and will so in the future. A properly designed plan
today, should give us the guidance for a road toward tomorrow.
If that is found to have
merit by the General Manager, the next step would be to explore the options
suggested.
Examining the various
options would be the responsibility of the General Manager, and then her
recommendations should then be placed before the Board for guidance in the
options recommended.
Finally, I believe any
option or options considered must be placed before the members for a final
vote. Those options and ballot should include commentary, pro and con, each
recommendation including realistic cost estimates to the members in order to for
them to make an intelligent decision at the time they
vote.
Let me fully emphasize my
belief that no board should be allowed to go forward with any venture until it
is put before the members for their approval.
As you can see, it is time we accepted the
motto:
Failure is not an
Option
- - - - - - - - -
We must do the proper homework to make that a
reality.
Got a comment or question of Forrest Fetherolf?
Send it to:
| ||
Looking at Sun City Anthem through the eyes of its independent minded resident community.
Information Pages
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Forrest Fetherolf...Position Paper 3
2 comments:
From Bud McQuillan...to...Anthem Opinions
ReplyDelete
As I am reading another Journal of opinions, it seems a restaurant solution is at hand.
By golly Self-Management is the solution, or if you think the SCA Board has squandered money on the past five restaurants, just wait and see where a not yet projected dues increase would be going.
But fear not, according to the written word, it is an opinion, that self-management of our restaurant is the way to go. This, after acknowledging the Board members who have been most intimately involved with the restaurant.
So if you cut through the pontification, what we have here are Board members who may manage the restaurant, with presumably the same accountability, as Vic's.
Just when you thought you might be able to enjoy the Summer, a new nightmare is on the horizon.
As I am reading another Journal of opinions, it seems a restaurant solution is at hand.
By golly Self-Management is the solution, or if you think the SCA Board has squandered money on the past five restaurants, just wait and see where a not yet projected dues increase would be going.
But fear not, according to the written word, it is an opinion, that self-management of our restaurant is the way to go. This, after acknowledging the Board members who have been most intimately involved with the restaurant.
So if you cut through the pontification, what we have here are Board members who may manage the restaurant, with presumably the same accountability, as Vic's.
Just when you thought you might be able to enjoy the Summer, a new nightmare is on the horizon.
Consideration should be given to have the space/restaurant under the management of Buckman's - they do a wonderful job both in food selection and great customer service.
Thank you.