Former Sun City Anthem Vice President
and Finance Committee Chairman
Endorses
Orth...Pope...Anderson
Ballot Positions
2-3-4
Jim Mayfield
The
single issue that SCA homeowners should consider when deciding for
whom to vote in this year’s board election is whether they want SCA
board members who represent the best interests of a broad majority of
homeowners or board members who represent their entrenched, selfish
minority interests?
You
might think that answering this question is a no-brainer. But for
years, a small group of self-selected insiders have used tactics
designed to distract and divide homeowners in their attempts to
convince a majority of homeowners to vote against our best interest.
Their efforts have been successful. Their control of SCA governance
has resulted in
A
reserve fund with a deficit of over $1.5 million, and growing
An
over compensated management group
Multiple
restaurant failures
Legal
and accounting professionals controlled by management instead of the
SCA Board
The
destruction of volunteer standing committees designed to protect us
The
loss of transparency by hiding information from homeowners, and
An
unwelcoming, indeed hostile, atmosphere that discourages highly
qualified in our community from serving on the board and the
standing committees.
In
2020, SCA homeowners have the opportunity to regain control of the
SCA governance process by electing board members who will represent
our best interests, not the narrow self-interests of the few. I urge
you to vote for the following candidates so that SCA can return to
governance that represents the vast majority of SCA homeowners
BOARD
CANDIDATES FOR OUR INTERESTS
NELSON
ORTH
(2)
RICHARD
POPE
(3)
STEVE
ANDERSON
(4)
That man is got to sick in the head, vicious, he is poison.
Kudos for you, not to respond.
You never hesitate to publish opinions that differ from yours.
Your fellow blogger goes insane if anyone disagrees with him.
He's both arrogant and insecure.
I've been told by a very reliable source that he is constantly monitoring your blog.
First the past 6 months, I've been cognizant that he launches an attack on you first..
Posted by: Linda Greenblatt | March 28, 2020 at 03:47 PM
David, Please don't change your way of communication with us.
I enjoy reading your posts.
I turned him off a long time ago.
Don't know don't care not intrested what it has to say.
It must be going stir crazy.
Posted by: Arnold Hinden | March 28, 2020 at 04:41 PM
I am sure you have seen the flyer sent by the restaurant crew asking for people to vote for them, at the same time the ballots arrived.
Don't know who paid for the piece, but I am afraid it will be used to confuse people to vote for them, since it appears there will no meeting to talk to the candidates.
My question is will Nelson Orth or Richard Pope send out a mailer, or how will they overcome not having a meeting for people to support them?
I know you have been very supportive, and have a good following of SCA residents that hopefully won't be swayed my what's looks like an official mailing piece, but will it be enough?
You also haven't said anything about Stephen Anderson, and my apologies if you have and I have missed it.
I hope your blog will be large enough to stop the restaurant crew, and the tens of thousands that they have cost us already
Hi Dick - I assume you are still recommending Pope and Orth for the Board?
Yes, I agree that vote for only 2 seats and let the other votes be diluted between the others.
Berman is really pushing Karrow….it is so disgusting.
Thanks, Virginia
After looking carefully at Steve Anderson, we feel he, along with Nelson Orth and Richard Pope. would make excellent Board members.
We will have a very positive look at Steve Anderson in the next day or two, but as far as looking at Karrow, Linow, and Perstein, NONE HAVE ANY IMPRESSIVE CREDENTIALS.
Linow's bankruptcy makes her a ridiculous choice; the only individuals who seem to share a "fondness" for Candace Karrow are the MACHINE; and Perstein....well...he lives in a world all his own.
I realize that there are 4 seats to be filled, but as far as the fourth, we'll leave that up to the community to choose THE BEST from THE WORST.
Personally, I will be voting for 2-3-4 only.
I think they picked Anderson as their 4th pick only because Berman advised against Richard or Nelson.
Berman opposed Anderson when he ran a few years ago.
I wonder why he is now ok with him now, but wasn't then?
Maybe some dissension in their ranks because I notice No Aletta Waterhouse.
Someone explain the humor- David but not Roz?
Maybe her fiasco with the Liberty Center kept her name off?
Then again,let me hear Bella Meese’s explanation for the Hillary buses, and Jim Long's for overriding the ARC and Community standards.
What a bunch of fools- - Court Jesters all.
a. 5 Failed restaurants...even accepting a bank robber and his wife as one of them and another who was caught walking out the back door with Sun City Anthem equipment.
b. A Liberty Center accepted on an "as is" basis....costing residents thousands of dollars.
c. An IRS settlement costing us $100,000 plus accounting and legal fees due to incorrectly filing a wrong Income Tax return.
d. Withholding the contents of a C.O.O. contract not deemed to be confidential by the Nevada Real Estate Division,a document still not available on an official SCA website, yet threatening possible criminal punishment to anyone disclosing it.
e. Citing hundreds or residents for the most ridiculous reasons as to how homes were decorated.
f. Being elected to the HOA Hall of Shame on Channel 13 on TWO occasions.
Yes siree, they are the best references to endorse anyone, aren't they?
Actions speak louder than words.
Steve, before you play both sides of the fence, let me remind you and our readers that a number of us walked the streets, knocking on doors, and putting us signs to support you in 2016.
Berman many have supported you verbally, but in NO OTHER WAY !.
But...your support from "The Machine" quickly dissipated following an article written by David Berman telling his readers om April 16, 2016 and I quote:
Dick Arendt: A Liar, But Is He Also Demented?
On April 18, 2016, you commented on that blog as follows, and I again quote, your addressing Mr. Berman>
"You deplore the fact that Mr. Arendt “expends an inordinate amount of time on his blog engaged in name-calling…” and that “…in my opinion, he drags the process down to an unacceptable level.” This is certainly your right to believe this and write about it, but what does little to further any modeling of sticking to the facts, you then engage in calling Mr. Arendt a liar and demented among other things. You are then doing what you deplore and accuse him of doing. For those people who know Mr. Arendt he is neither a liar or comes even close to being demented. That is derogatory and not necessary for a thorough discussion of the issues. Further as I have read Mr. Arendt’s articles he is to me an “equal opportunity” person in taking issue equally with men and women that he is in disagreement with."
There after, because you defended me, THE MACHINE did you in !