SUN CITY ANTHEM
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
INC.
BOARD RESOLUTION FOR
SUSPENDING CHANGES TO VENDOR INSURANCE, LICENSING, AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
PENDING FURTHER STUDY
WHEREAS, several months ago the General Manager
instituted new, or previously unenforced, requirements for increased insurance,
licensing and security applicable to vendors, Chartered Clubs, and/or members
who are holding events on SCA property; and
WHEREAS, many Owners and Club representatives have
attempted unsuccessfully to get the General Manager to institute less burdensome
methods to address an as-yet unidentified risk management problem that
precipitated the
change;
WHEREAS, there has been no satisfactory response to
mitigate Members concerns, or to create a more benign system, or to allow the
long-used and accepted practice to
stand;
WHEREAS, The Community Lifestyle Committee reported
to the May 25, 2017 Board of Directors
meeting:
Until management is certain about all aspects of
these requirements for insurance and business licenses, and can document the
need for these requirements, CLC asks management to consider suspending both
requirements.
Community
Lifestyle Committee will continue to work with management to come up with
reasonable requirements that protect the association from any sanctions and
penalties that might come from non-compliance, but we look to management to make
these requirements as clear and benign as possible for the
clubs.
WHEREAS, many Members believe that continuing a
seemingly arbitrary and capricious policy without adequate justification may
create more risk than is mitigated, i.e., by reducing SCAs reputation,
threatening property values, loss of quiet enjoyment of the common areas,
negatively impacting our quality of lifestyle by reducing the variety and
quality of entertainment
options;
WHEREAS, the Board Policy Manual 2 defines four
expected organizational results the GM is to achieve, 2A is relevant to this
issue:
Board Pollcy Manual
2A
Homeowners have a variety of entertainment options
and social, creative and physical activities that promote a sense of community
and well-being.
WHEREAS, the Board Policy Manual 3 defines
limitations on the GM in terms of the conditions which are to be avoided:
The GM must not cause or allow any practice,
activity, decision, or organizational circumstance which is either unlawful,
imprudent, damaged the public image of the Association or is in violation of the
Governing Documents, Board Policy, or commonly accepted business and
professional ethics and
practices.
WHEREAS, the Board Policy Manual 3.2
requires:
With respect to interactions with Members, Residents
and visitors, the GM shall not cause or allow conditions, procedures, or
decisions that are unsafe, discourteous, or unnecessarily
intrusive.
The GM must not allow or cause Members, Residents and
visitors to be confused about what may be expected and what may not be expected
from any service or amenity offered by the Association. (BPM
3.2C)
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
No insurance, security, or business license
requirements are to be implemented that hurt SCAs ability to achieve the
expected result of the organization as defined in BPM 2A (a variety of
entertainment options) unless the actual claims history at SCA specifically
involving vendors is documented to be significant enough to warrant the new
requirement and there is no feasible, less burdensome alternative that
would resolve the issue while better promoting a sense of well being and
community among the
membership.
SCA would not have to charge the entertainer for the use of Freedom Hall, charge $1 per on-line ticket (which, by the way is really cheesy and an embarrassment to all residents), etc. IF our HOA Fees weren't squandered away on quarter million dollar salaries and over-priced contractors.
Memo to SCA: "It's not what you earn - it's what you keep that counts".
Sandy needs to be retrained or fired.
Sandy Seddon also fired Meg Paulson who was wonderful and worked really hard.
Sandy hired a physical therapist who does no training for the people that work under her.
Dick, thanks to you, Rana, Nona and whomever else is responsible for bringing sense to this insurance question.
I am a member of a college community band and liaison for many concerts around the valley, all of which are done to benefit great charities.
In the 30 years our director has done events and the 30 years I’ve been involved as an events planner, we never heard of such a thing until we organized a recent concert.
As far as SCA making a profit on these events, I’ll be taking them off my venue list for sure.
Proceeds from our concerts, as mentioned, go to charities
Musicians volunteer their services.
For greedy SCA to try and make a buck on this is reprehensible.
I would appreciate if your not naming the college, as I am not their official spokesperson, but I can tell you that the officials at the college thought SCA was crazy.
Your comment was so heartfelt. As requested the name of the college was omitted and your comments were edited in order to protect you, but know there are many in SCA that wish you well, and that your endeavors are so appreciated by the masses.
Unfortunately, those in control, are so concerned with their own well-being and overpaid incomes, they believe they are beyond reproach.
We will try our best to make people aware of this in order to rectify the problem.
The plight of local entertainment is at stake, and the line to protect those dedicated professionals HAS NOW BEEN DRAWN.