Just In...Election Results

Who Won and Who Lost 2014 Primary     Results include only those contested races

REGISTRATION & TURNOUT 775,859 Registered Voters Voting Method Total %/Reg ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 45,807 5.90 % EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 61,774 7.96 % MAIL TURNOUT 14,960 1.93 % Total 122,541 15.79 %

DEM REGISTRATION & TURNOUT 347,560 Registered Voters Voting Method Total %/Reg ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 17,187 4.95 % EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 25,571 7.36 % MAIL TURNOUT 6,375 1.83 % Total 49,133 14.14 %

REP REGISTRATION & TURNOUT 243,079 Registered Voters Voting Method Total %/Reg ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 23,853 9.81 % EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 29,550 12.16 % MAIL TURNOUT 6,913 2.84 % Total 60,316 24.81 %

NP REGISTRATION & TURNOUT 185,220 Registered Voters Voting Method Total %/Reg ELECTION DAY TURNOUT 4,767 2.57 % EARLY VOTE TURNOUT 6,653 3.59 % MAIL TURNOUT 1,672 0.90 % Total 13,092 7.07 %

---

DEM - GOVERNOR VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Chang, Charles ''Charlie'' 3,835 8.33 % Conquest, Frederick L. 1,323 2.87 % Frye, Stephen H. 4,853 10.54 % Goodman, Robert ''Bob'' 13,382 29.06 % Hyepock, Chris 2,838 6.16 % Rheinhart, Allen 1,958 4.25 % Rutledge, John 3,179 6.90 % Shabazz, Abdul H. 1,988 4.32 % None of These Candidates 12,690 27.56 % Total   46,046

REP - GOVERNOR VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Hamilton, Eddie ''In Liberty'' 2,156 3.61 % Marinch, Gary 572 0.96 % Sandoval, Brian 53,782 90.09 % Tarbell, William 897 1.50 % Tighe, Thomas J. 775 1.30 % None of These Candidates 1,516 2.54 % Total   59,698

DEM - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Flores, Lucy 34,184 73.74 % Kulkin, Harley Zane 5,801 12.51 % None of These Candidates 6,373 13.75 % Total   46,358

REP - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Dyer, Chris 2,838 4.77 % Hutchison, Mark 31,463 52.90 % Lowden, Sue 23,523 39.55 % None of These Candidates 1,652 2.78 % Total   59,476     REP - STATE CONTROLLER VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Arlint, Cort R. 9,213 17.25 % Herr, Barry 13,944 26.11 % Knecht, Ron 23,420 43.86 % None of These Candidates 6,822 12.78 % Total   53,399   DEM - REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS, DIST 3 VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 413 of 413 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Bilbray, Erin 13,203 84.03 % Campbell, Zachary ''Mr. Z.'' 2,510 15.97 % Total   15,713

 

SHERIFF VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Barboza, Angel M. 5,516 4.78 % Burns, Larry 32,612 28.28 % Deam, Tim 1,109 0.96 % Gronauer, Robert ''Bobby G'' 7,300 6.33 % Lombardo, Joe 41,809 36.26 % Martines, Gordon 2,124 1.84 % Moody, Ted 20,733 17.98 % Page, Kenneth ''Nick'' 1,503 1.30 % Roman, Bill 2,593 2.25 % Total   115,299

DEM - CONSTABLE, HENDERSON TOWNSHIP VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 177 of 177 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Pitts, Joe 3,017 49.72 % Watson, Terry 3,051 50.28 % Total   6,068   REP - CONSTABLE, HENDERSON TOWNSHIP VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 177 of 177 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Hale, Douglas 1,122 9.98 % Malone, Jason A. 3,057 27.20 % Mitchell, Earl 4,762 42.36 % Stites, John 2,300 20.46 % Total   11,241

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 2 

VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)

Candidate	Graph	Votes	%/Total
Jefferson, Phung		18,286	17.56 %
Scotti, Richard		33,464	32.14 %
Skupa, William S. ''Bill''		25,467	24.46 %
Watkins, John G.		26,913	25.85 %
Total		104,130

 

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 22 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)

Candidate	Graph	Votes	%/Total
Gale, Bruce L.		17,491	17.09 %
Hafter, Jacob		18,972	18.54 %
Johnson, Susan		65,891	64.38 %
Total		102,354

 

 

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 24 
VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)

Candidate	Graph	Votes	%/Total
Ashby, Anthony		11,063	10.82 %
Crockett, Jim		46,366	45.34 %
Hardy, Jr., Joe		33,809	33.06 %
Liker, Tony		11,028	10.78 %
Total		102,266

 

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DEPARTMENT 28  VOTE FOR 1  Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Bush, Susan 36,787 35.40 % Israel, Ron 56,982 54.84 % Pool, Robert 10,143 9.76 % Total   103,912       DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. B VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Bezian, Ellen J. 4,441 4.40 % Brewer, Kristine 12,704 12.60 % Femiano, Jane D. 14,557 14.44 % Kurtz, Thomas G. ''Tom'' 14,994 14.87 % Marquis, Linda 19,591 19.43 % Scalia, II, Joseph A. 16,327 16.19 % Winesett, Shann D. 11,140 11.05 % Zana, Heather Bailey 7,080 7.02 % Total   100,834

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. C VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Burton, Rebecca 34,239 34.44 % Howard, Jr., John Hall ''Jack'' 24,001 24.15 % Hughes, Lynn 19,862 19.98 % Kimble-Simms, Marsha 10,688 10.75 % Mercer, Michele ''Shell'' 10,613 10.68 % Total   99,403

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. J VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Hughes, Rena G. 40,089 40.72 % Perez, Romeo R. 21,576 21.91 % Pollock, Kenneth E. 36,790 37.37 % Total   98,455

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. L 

VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)

Candidate	Graph	Votes	%/Total
Elliott, Jennifer L.		42,476	43.83 %
Gaudet, Paul ''Mitch''		31,232	32.23 %
Perry, Mary		23,210	23.95 %
Total		96,918

 

 

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. P 

VOTE FOR 1 

Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %)

Candidate	Graph	Votes	%/Total
Ford, David R.		24,437	25.01 %
Gibbs, Nathan		34,788	35.61 %
Pomrenze, Sandra L.		38,479	39.38 %
Total		97,704

 

DST COURT JUDGE, FAMILY DIV. DEPT. T VOTE FOR 1 Precincts Reporting: 1088 of 1088 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Brown, Lisa M. 36,912 37.92 % Maskall, Maria 30,710 31.55 % Nathan, Gayle 29,722 30.53 % Total   97,344

 

REGENT, STATE UNIVERSITY DISTRICT 3  VOTE FOR 1  Precincts Reporting: 109 of 109 (100 %) Candidate Graph Votes %/Total Hurst, Tom 2,428 25.08 % Nigam, Swadeep 1,112 11.49 % Page, Kevin J. 4,163 43.00 % Spangelo, Bryan 1,979 20.44 % Total   9,682