I would like to thank Nelson Orth for writing about this subject; I am new to SCA but since my attendance at the July Finance Comm. meeting I have had questions about the SCA relationship with the Anthem Council; I look forward to your additional segments on this subject; I do have a couple questions as follows: 1. If 2 other communities or HOA's gain benefit from the expenditures of the Anthem Council, it would seem to me there must be a legal principle that requires an entity that is being enriched by others to be financially responsible; why send a letter and accept NO; has legal counsel for SCA or AC pursued this in any way? 2. If SCA is a member of this Council with other HOA's it seems as though the Anthem Council is subject to the review of any member of SCA without obtaining permission from anyone. You indicate UNLESS the rules have changed as to gaining access to documents, what rule is this? where is it written? who voted on it? Is this a rule stated in NRS 116? Finally, I am not an attorney and my thoughts may or may not have legal standing, that is for others to determine! As a new SCA resident I find it amazing that these issues have not been addressed over the last 20 + years.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/TwoDice-58bddad45f9b58af5c4aa0d4.jpg)
I would like to thank Nelson Orth for writing about this subject; I am new to SCA but since my attendance at the July Finance Comm. meeting I have had questions about the SCA relationship with the Anthem Council; I look forward to your additional segments on this subject;
ReplyDeleteI do have a couple questions as follows:
1. If 2 other communities or HOA's gain benefit from the expenditures of the Anthem Council, it would seem to me there must be a legal principle that requires an entity that is being enriched by others to be financially responsible; why send a letter and accept NO; has legal counsel for SCA or AC pursued this in any way?
2. If SCA is a member of this Council with other HOA's it seems as though the Anthem Council is subject to the review of any member of SCA without obtaining permission from anyone. You indicate UNLESS the rules have changed as to gaining access to documents, what rule is this? where is it written? who voted on it? Is this a rule stated in NRS 116?
Finally, I am not an attorney and my thoughts may or may not have legal standing, that is for others to determine!
As a new SCA resident I find it amazing that these issues have not been addressed over the last 20 + years.