| 
Thoughts on a Restaurant 
by 
Forrest 
Fetherolf 
Position Paper 3 
At this stage of our transition to self-management, a restaurant 
must be considered a future consideration, not one that requires immediate 
attention. We must "crawl" before we "run" in the next year for the sake of our 
financial well being. 
Sun City Residents have been exposed to and suffered through five 
restaurant failures over our seventeen years. 
Nearly a million dollars has been spent on remodeling the space 
allotted to the restaurant, repairing and replacing aging and abused kitchen 
equipment, and subsidizing the restaurant time and time again, to allow the 
restaurant to keep the doors open. 
Resident members are fed 
up with the past results, and so am I. 
In December 2015, the Board leadership finally threw in the towel 
and negotiated a settlement whereby the restaurant would cease operation. 
 
The actual cost of the restaurant settlement and losses SCA 
incurred as a result of writing off the failed loans and unpaid utilities, 
remain a mystery.  
Those estimated costs are between $53,000 to $90,000 based on a financial report given during 
the last monthly board meeting. 
Those 
substantial losses to our community are not acceptable, and will not be 
tolerated if I am elected to the Board. 
Good sound financial 
planning must be a part of any future option, and that plan must include both 
qualified advice from professionals in the restaurant industry, sound 
statistical evidence, and most importantly, a vote of the members to make a 
final decision. 
We can no longer rely on 
an informal survey that has no statistical evidence to support a successful 
operation.  
We live in 2016 and we 
must accept that today's world has tools to determine success that far exceeded 
any we had. 
One option to determine 
success would be to hire a professional organization to do statistical studies 
examining various options we have available.  If the studies are found to have 
merit, they would be explored by the General Manager. "Winging it" has produced 
failure in the past, and will so in the future.  A properly designed plan 
today, should give us the guidance for a road toward tomorrow.  
 
If that is found to have 
merit by the General Manager, the next step would be to explore the options 
suggested. 
Examining the various 
options would be the responsibility of the General Manager, and then her 
recommendations should then be placed before the Board for guidance in the 
options recommended. 
Finally, I believe any 
option or options considered must be placed before the members for a final 
vote.  Those options and ballot should include commentary, pro and con, each 
recommendation including realistic cost estimates to the members in order to for 
them to make an intelligent decision at the time they 
vote. 
Let me fully emphasize my 
belief that no board should be allowed to go forward with any venture until it 
is put before the members for their approval. 
As you can see, it is time we accepted the 
motto: 
Failure is not an 
Option 
- - - - - - - - - 
We must do the proper homework to make that a 
reality. 
Got a comment or question of Forrest Fetherolf? 
Send it to: | ||
Looking at Sun City Anthem through the eyes of its independent minded resident community.
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Forrest Fetherolf...Position Paper 3
2 comments:
 - From Bud McQuillan...to...Anthem Opinions ReplyDelete
 As I am reading another Journal of opinions, it seems a restaurant solution is at hand.
 By golly Self-Management is the solution, or if you think the SCA Board has squandered money on the past five restaurants, just wait and see where a not yet projected dues increase would be going.
 But fear not, according to the written word, it is an opinion, that self-management of our restaurant is the way to go. This, after acknowledging the Board members who have been most intimately involved with the restaurant.
 So if you cut through the pontification, what we have here are Board members who may manage the restaurant, with presumably the same accountability, as Vic's.
 Just when you thought you might be able to enjoy the Summer, a new nightmare is on the horizon.
 
 

 

As I am reading another Journal of opinions, it seems a restaurant solution is at hand.
By golly Self-Management is the solution, or if you think the SCA Board has squandered money on the past five restaurants, just wait and see where a not yet projected dues increase would be going.
But fear not, according to the written word, it is an opinion, that self-management of our restaurant is the way to go. This, after acknowledging the Board members who have been most intimately involved with the restaurant.
So if you cut through the pontification, what we have here are Board members who may manage the restaurant, with presumably the same accountability, as Vic's.
Just when you thought you might be able to enjoy the Summer, a new nightmare is on the horizon.
Consideration should be given to have the space/restaurant under the management of Buckman's - they do a wonderful job both in food selection and great customer service.
Thank you.