Major Myths in "Selling" Mini-Golf
It certainly didn't take a long period 
of time for an alternative blogster to make attempts at "winging" answers to questions previous brought up by Anthem 
Opinions.
After all...based 
on the numerous disastrous financial debacles he has recommended in the 
past....(three consecutive restaurants that 
had more RED INK than PEOPLE who ever ate or 
currently eat their food).
At this desperate 
stage....
...it's now "anything" to "sell" something....no matter what affect it might have on 
the economic well-being of a community.
Let us reiterate our basic 
question....which seems to be "conveniently" avoided in his latest 
epistle...
 
Should the people have 
the ability to decide on this HUGH EXPENDITURE?
...or...will it be "politics as usual" in supplying inaccurate and slanted 
information to obtain this ridiculous idea of a mini-golf course in the middle 
of a desert ?
Obviously the points made by Anthem 
Opinions disturbed a number of his readers; and true to form, he once again 
provided answers that were "winged" without 
substantiation....although his writings would have you believe they are 
fact.
Anthem Opinions had a strong concern 
regarding insurance coverage. 
After all, our two owners have a combined 70 years of insurance 
experience versus those of an ex-lawyer who 
lost his license to practice law.
His answer.....a "winged" comment without 
substantiation stating a "reliable source" 
...
...informed him that there would be no 
additional cost for insurance regarding 
liability coverage.
Sure...no cost...for additional risk?  
Anyone out there actually believe that 
to be true?
Probably the same people who originally 
signed a petition believing his "pet project" would 
be free !
When was the last time you contacted 
your insurance agent and asked him to INCREASE your coverage and that individual 
told you, "Sure..no problem..and we won't charge you an 
additional cent to do it!"
What reliable 
source? 
THE PROOF 
POSITIVE...is...IN THE WRITING....not a verbal unnamed source. 
And it's very simple to obtain...IF 
TRUE...
..a letter ON THE 
INSURER'S STATIONERY over the SIGNATURE of a 
CORPORATE OFFICER....stating that there is NO 
increase in premium or increase in liability as a result of building such a 
mini-golf course...
...and retaining it for future 
reference...
...is the ONLY 
intelligent manner in which to protect this association against LEGAL 
LIABILITY and unnecessary financial expenditure.
Now let's discuss the "fee"...which again, he "conveniently" WINGS IT ...this time...
"I can't see anyone 
arguing that we should make our guests pay for enjoying the facility in the 
company of their member hosts".
Really? 
How about running that one past the 
property owners...something the advocate is deathly afraid to do for fear of the 
reaction the MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS would have.
My guess is that the answer would be 
short and sweet.
If they 
use it...they should pay for it.  
It's that simple. 
Why should the balance of the 
membership FINANCE any cost a guest incurs, and incur 
liability for them as well?
We are a retirement community....NOT a playground for children.
Now let's talk "safety" !  
How about the sales pitch trying to 
correlate death with any form of safety?  
What a bunch of...as Judge Judy would 
say.... "Who Shot John" !
It's not death...it's a different kind of safety that concerns us...but then 
again...to dramatize the statement...how is it portrayed by the "alternative 
blogster"?  
More "WINGING 
IT" ! 
He turns an honest safety concern 
into....
There ARE 
safety issues....
...FLYING BALLS 
INTO AUTO AND HOME WINDOWS.....
...KIDS  SWINGING A CLUB INCORRECTLY AND HITTING A BALL WITH 
FORCE...
...SENIORS TRIPPING 
ON RAISED GUARD RAILS.
...ALL CREATE SAFETY ISSUES....AND...POTENTIAL LAWSUITS.
...ALL AT A TIME 
WHEN SELF-MANAGMENT OF OUR ASSOCIATION MEANS....FULL 
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY AND ALL CONTINGENCIES.
How about it, Mr. 
Advocate? 
If you're so convinced 
that safety or liability is NO CONCERN...
We have simple request 
for you and any of your supporters to prove it !
JUST SIGN A 
STATEMENT YOU PERSONALLY or ANY MEMBER OF YOUR CLUB....WILL ASSUME ALL LIABILITY 
FOR ANY DAMAGE, INJURY OR LAWSUIT THAT MIGHT 
RESULT.
Let's see how many "charter members" of 
that club would be there to sign such a guarantee !
Other noticeable omissions from his 
"winging" the facts.
Members must 
accompany ANY GUESTS....and that means UNBEARABLE HEAT on seniors during 
the greatest percentage of the time.
How do neighbors surrounding the 
Liberty Center feel about this option...being subjected to additional traffic or 
strangers walking their neighborhood invading their 
privacy?
On Saturday, April 25, 
2015, a HOMICIDE occurred within a short distance 
from the site of the proposed project.
No mention of those folks, is there?  
Nothing in any way as to their 
feelings....the concerns of people who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to 
purchase a home to allow them "peace" in their retirement 
years....
...the same people who had to THREATHEN legal action when it first appeared that Liberty 
Center would not be built years ago, despite the developer's sales 
representatives telling them it would be...in order to entice them into signing 
on the dotted line....
...the same people who believed a bocce 
court would be built CORRECTLY, yet THROUGH THE 
INCOMPENTENCE of the board at the time....
...THE WIFE OF THE 
BLOGSTER BEING A MEMBER OF THAT BOARD....
...accepting that project "as is", rather than examining and 
viewing it...noticeably seeing it  was IMPROPERLY 
CONSTRUCTED.
Haven't those people sustained enough 
conflict over the years?
It certainly would be refreshing if 
this matter was put to referendum...it would solve the entire problem...and end 
all further discussion.
It's "the people's property"... so 
...why not let "the people" decide ?
...unless, of 
course, the advocates are afraid of the reaction of the other 98.5% of property 
owners who will finance their 1.5% whim !
At any rate, Mr. Advocate, try 
something different for a change....STOP WINGING IT 
!
You did your best in selling property 
owners down the river regarding financing a restaurant that you are now "slanting" as to imply financial 
independence...
...without 
mentioning that WE HAVE FINANCED THEM AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN....to 
accomplish it !
Now you want to do it again with an 
expensive MINI----MINI nine hole golf 
course?
In order that you can show some GOOD FAITH....and CONFIDENCE 
in your belief there is that much interest in your 
proposal...
....that is....if 
you have that ability to do so...WITHOUT WINGING 
IT...
If you are so convinced that a 
mini-golf club will be that successful, why not PROVE the 
interest by TRYING to gather those supposed 240 people over the next 3 months 
for a club tournament or event on a LOCAL mini-course first...before our 
community would drop the $200,000?
But...make sure 
you allow the participants to play ONLY NINE 
HOLES...
And...play that NINE HOLES on an OUTDOOR 
COURSE...
And...in JUNE, 
JULY, and/or AUGUST.
It's called...PUT UP...or...SHUT UP 
!
When will this community ever wake up 
to see that this concept is not a good idea for THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE...as all 
projects SHOULD BE?
The 
answer....
...when COMMON 
SENSE can prevail, and SELFISHNESS on the 
parts of those who know how to "work a system" can be 
looked at for what they are....
...financial drains on us 
all.
Anthem Opinions 
Administration