Due to the overwhelming number of emails we 
received regarding the article entitled "What is an 
Amenity?" we contacted the author of the editorial, Tim Stebbins, to clarify a few of his 
comments.
Mr. Stebbins graciously accepted our invitation, 
and has written this 
follow-up to that article.
More on Amenities 
and the Restaurant 
The Sun City Anthem Public Offering Statement 
guarantees and promises all home owners in our community the 
following:
“The 
right to use the recreational facilities described herein is limited to members 
in good standing and their guests. Homeowners who do not reside in the community 
with an age-qualified resident do not have the right to utilize the recreational 
facilities.”
It goes on to list the recreational facilities (amenities). 
That list includes the restaurant and bar.
Thus the 
restaurant and bar are for us homeowners only and 
are not to be available to the public at large for dining or 
catering events.
So far our 
boards of directors have chosen to ignore or reject the portions of the Public 
Offering Statement pertaining to the restaurant and 
bar.
Nevada law 
requires the developer to provide the Public Offering Statement to all buyers 
and to include all amenities or planned amenities as well as the use rights by 
homeowners.
Nevada law goes on to say this is a form 
of express warranty or implied warranty. 
Those warranty and promise obligations apply not only to the 
initial buyer but “run with the property” 
and are fully transferred to all future 
buyers.
Nevada law also states warranties may 
only be “excluded or modified by agreement of the 
parties”. 
So unless you agreed, or a majority of 
SCA unit owners agreed, to forfeit the members only 
exclusive right to use the restaurant and bar, the 
board of directors alone does not have the authority to deny or deprive you of 
the promises and guarantees in the Public Offering 
Statement.
I am not 
aware of any such agreement by previous and new SCA homeowners to forfeit the 
rights, promises and warranties contained in the Public Offering 
Statement.
________________________
Anthem Opinions Commentary
This follow-up editorial deserves a clarification from our board of 
directors.  
Let us fully stress....
Anthem Opinions is NOT being accusatory in any 
way; this is NOT a witch hunt; and, we wish to be fair in EVERY way; however, the supposed 
use of resident dues contributions, subjecting the financial well-being of our 
community to unnecessary real estate taxation, by violating the Public Offering 
Statement, deserves a proper explanation.
We urge you to write each member of our board to clarify this matter, 
specifically asking what legal justification they have to apparently ignore the 
terms of the Public Offering Statement. 
If you receive a response stating it does not apply, 
ASK WHY it does not apply.
Here are the email addresses of the various Sun City Anthem board 
members. 
All you need do, is click on the respective email address, and the email to that board member should appear on your computer screen.
We will GLADLY publish ANY board response directly sent to Anthem 
Opinions at www.scaopinions.com. 
In addition, we will also "suspend" our "anonymous" policy in this particular case, and publish ANY 
board member responses made to residents that our readers wish to forward to 
us.
We would also like to know if any of our readers send queries to the 
board members, and do NOT receive any 
response.
Anthem Opinions strongly believes....
Accountability is not a desire; it is a RIGHT 
!