Sun City Anthem 
2015 Board 
Candidates
a
Hodgepodge of the Past 
& Present
(Part 3 of 
4)
This is the third installment of our 
board candidate critiques, and today, we will closely examine the two incumbents 
seeking reelection.
Let's start our summary by looking 
at...
Bella 
Meese
If 
one were asked....
 "Who is the biggest 
disappointment  as a board member?"
 Bella Meese would sadly, hold that honor 
!
What began 4 years ago with "optimism" 
has deteriorated so rapidly over the years, that few who knew her "then", would have difficulty recognizing her "now" !
This candidate and current board member is referred 
to in many circles as ..."I need a place to have 
lunch"  Bella as a result of her making that public statement when asked as to 
why she continued to vote again and again to subsidize Cafe V with association 
funds, you, the residents, contribute through dues 
paid.
Her history of fiscal responsibility can best be 
described as "SPEND SPEND SPEND".
This individual has NO BUSINESS experience, and that has 
become quite obvious over the years through her voting record at spending 
whatever has been proposed...
...rarely if 
ever, questioning the amounts involved.
She has maintained a deaf ear again and 
again from association members regarding a "checks and balance" procedure of 
association expenditures.
Her background has been a "community 
organizer" and has a past record of flipping between political allies and 
opponents more times than a pancake on a griddle.
She originally 
supported prior board member and current candidate, Bob 
Frank, and ran alongside him a number of years ago... when he lost reelection.
At the same time she lost her first bid for election to the 
board....
...she apparently realized that her 
board member ambitions would be better suited and "politically expedient" to no longer 
support Mr. Frank. 
After that election loss, she decided 
to cuddle up with members of the "Unity Party" 
camp...
...the same 
individuals who cruelly took action against Bob 
Frank, the person she previously had heavily supported for 
election.
...and with their assistance and 
support....she has prevailed for the past 4 years.
Over that timeframe, those who 
initially supported her would eventually realize that being elected also meant 
abandoning a number of her long term friends and 
associates.
George 
Meese, her husband, has been influential as the "Content Coordinator" of a monthly publication  entitled 
"The Villages of Sun City Anthem",  mailed to each 
resident of the Sun City Anthem community on or about the first of each 
month.
If one looks closely to the monthly 
glossy cover page, those residents featured have almost 
entirely been past ADVOCATES of the UNITY 
PARTY.
This is a FOR 
PROFIT publication, and questions have arisen as to whether or not it 
creates a conflict of interest for Mrs. Meese as it 
pertains to her fiduciary responsibilities as a board member. 
Fiduciary responsibilities include 
"avoiding self dealing" whereby "a self-dealing transaction is one in which a 
director enters into on behalf of the corporation that directly or indirectly benefits the director personally." 
This can 
take the form of the director being a shareholder of another company that the 
corporation is dealing with, the director having a competing 
business, or the 
director’s close family member standing to benefit from a contract that 
corporation intends to enter into. 
Rumors (unsubstantiated) 
have arisen that the advertising revenue generated by 
"The Villages of Sun City Anthem" monthly magazine, 
have had a negative impact on revenue obtained by our community publication, 
"The Spirit" each home receives 
monthly.
We believe in order to dispel 
those rumors and remove the "cloud" that currently 
exists...
... it would benefit the 
community if our association president, in one of her "president reports" would immediately publish "The Spirit" revenue prior to and  since 
publication of "The Villages of Sun City 
Anthem" commenced.  
We also would ask those figures be INDEPENDENTLY examined as well, prior to 
disclosure. 
A number of people have never forgotten 
her words:
"Anything to get 
elected"
In our opinion, there is no good way to 
say it...
...she has plagued Sun City Anthem 
financially for years.  
We won't rehash her 100% voting record of using association funds to subsidize the 
restaurant at each available opportunity.
In summary...a vote 
for  Bella Meese is 
simply...a bad 
decision...
...and we give her a 
"D" as a board member who does 
not deserve reelection.
Why?  Simply 
stated...
"Actions Speak Louder Than Words"
Two terms are enough for 
any individual...especially one with her poor voting record.
Our next candidate for consideration is 
incumbent....
Jim 
Mayfield
Here's a guy who loves to "talk the 
talk", but never seems to fully "walk the 
walk".
His voting record closely parallels 
that of Mrs. Meese; but on the positive side, he has 
been a sharp critic of the financial abilities and failures of FSR, our 
management company.
Jim Mayfield has the ability to do the 
job...but he's also a "politician's" politician.
His attempts at making positive 
change have often been rebuked by fellow board 
members...
...and his frustration with their 
inability to change...their need to maintain the status quo...is beginning to be 
evident.  
That became apparent when he and one other board member last voted to CEASE subsidizing the restaurant with association 
funds...a battle he 
lost.
When the management contract was last 
reviewed and another firm other than our current FSR was chosen by a committee 
in charge of searching out competitive bids, he and two other board members 
traveled to Arizona to what was believed  to be a "finalization" of the 
deal....
...but....suddenly, that firm, shortly 
after the meeting, decided to withdraw their bid to manage our 
association.
It has always been difficult to 
understand why a firm going through such an 
extensive and expensive road to obtain a contract...
...be recommended by an independent 
team charged with, and completing such an exhaustive 
search...
...then withdraw their offer to manage 
our association shortly after that meeting.
Perhaps Mr. Mayfield might fully 
explain just WHAT HAPPENED at that meeting to cause 
that firm to withdraw from a substantial contract that would compensate 
them millions of dollars each year ????
He's tried a number of times to 
convince other board members of his beliefs, but the "cronyism" of certain 
other board members (current and those retiring) have prevented him from 
achieving much success. 
...and we believe any success he MAY achieve if elected to a second term, will revolve 
around others being elected who share his "reform" 
beliefs.
One very strong positive is that 
Mayfield has the reputation of answering all emails that residents send 
him...and for that..we commend him.
We may not like all of his 
decisions...but we do appreciate a recent change he's 
made....
....explaining why he made 
them...another positive.
We believe Jim Mayfield gets a "C" for his 
past board service, but with a short field of 6 candidates, we believe he deserves another term on the SCA 
board.
In our final installment to be 
published tomorrow, April 1st, we will discuss the final two candidates, Carl Weinstein and Rex Weddle.
 




 
Mr. Berman's "take" on Sun City Anthem governance is certainly quite different than we at Anthem Opinions see it..then again that's the difference between the FULL STORY and HALF OF IT.
ReplyDeleteFirst, he again starts his "love fest" manner of commentary (no hatred of course), by referring to another publication ( presumably Anthem Opinions because we have been the only blog to give our HONEST opinion based on UNTAINTED facts), as "hostile" and using anther word, "vigilante" which I am sure will be aimed at candidate, Bob Frank.
...and we believe that those who have witnessed his rants against those he "loves" will continue...it's what he refers to as "journalism."
He recently brought out his "endorsement list" by referring to some items we feel must be addressed.
Let's start with his comment on Barbara Holland of the Review Journal, a supposed HOA expert.
States Mr, Berman:
"HOA expert Barbara Holland wrote this about the role of homeowners-association boards:
Most associations are organized as nonprofit corporations, directors' first obligation is the corporation, not the homeowners"
Our comment:
First, Ms. Holland PAYS TO PLACE HER COLUMN IN THE RJ and has stood for anti-homeowner rights in every way.
She is a favorite of "bully boards" and attorneys that have anti-homeowner stances.
Second, if homeowners (the ones who pay for everything) are second in line to those who spend it, we have a problem...that needs to be fixed !
Now to some of the other comments made by Mr. B.
He makes a statement that $1,100 is the mark of success and that residents might even get some of it back!
Our comment:
That also means we've been overcharged and that surplus SHOULD BE returned. Why, it's the right thing to do, because it could subject residents to another IRS investigation and a "bargain basement fine" of ONLY $100,000 PLUS LEGAL FEES.
Next up...his comment that a $1.1 budget surplus allows a board to have "pleasurable" expenditures toward maintenance and capital projects.
Our comment:
That's for sure ! Even we couldn't top the word "pleasurable". That "pleasurable" attitude has caused more waste as a result of the bidding system, a good example of which was placing a new roof on Anthem Center...costing $500,000...that could have been easily repaired, rather than replaced....but the "budget" said spend it, and that overrode "common sense".
...and the capital projects part...sounds like a mini-golf course...that an Asset Enhancement Fee is used to BYPASS the VOTING of the electorate, and allow 4 people to spend at will !
The best of the best ! His comment about "stabilizing the on premises Anthem Center restaurant...that has never missed a lease payment...that runs for the next 3 years.
Our comment:
Oh please, spare us the malarkey !
We were unaware that "stabilization" also meant reducing the rent to a point (from the original lease amount of $4,000 to $2,000 to now, $1,000) that costs our association to lose money each and every month due to the property taxes the association must pay ($24,000 each year).
...and does "stabilization" also include lending them $20,000 at a 2% interest rate (below the prime rate) to pay their past due utility bills ?
Bottomline...just more "half truth" in order to maintain a system that is sorely in need of reform.