As initially stated, he is now subject to a formal complaint for
actions he, himself, has committed , alleged to have VIOLATED NRS 116
regulations pertaining to ballot election interference.
If found to have violated the Nevada statues, what would be his
current position on HIMSELF?
What is Being Done and What Should Be Done, to Mitigate the
Liberty Center Damages?
Has FSR’s payroll (which SCA reimburses) been reduced to
reflect the reduction in service? If so, how much money is the community
saving per week, or per month?
Should/Has FRS’s monthly management fee been
reduced/suspended due to the reduction in services?
TODAY
Now that he is the current Association Treasurer, what has he done
to curb association payrolls?
The top 5 management positions in Sun City Anthem
now exceed an annual compensation level of $1,000,000 plus the cost of
benefits.
How Will You Evaluate Employee Performance?
Within a
year or so, SCA’s new employees will be expecting pay raises and/or bonuses.
How will you determine if they did an unsatisfactory job, an adequate job, or an
excellent job?
Will pay
raises be granted for increasing the number of bus trips, organizing more
parking lot sales, cleaner bathrooms…. Just how will employee performance be
determined?
TODAY
836 Sun City Anthem Unit owners have signed a "no confidence"
petition against Sandra Seddon, the Association General Manager.
The cover
letter which accompanied these complaints asked they be included in the employee
personnel file for purposes of future employee evaluation.
Has this taken
place?
In addition, formal complaints are being filed with the Nevada
Real Estate Division alleging the General Manager and Community Association
Manager for Ballot interference violation.
If found to be in violation of Nevada law, what course of action
does he favor in light of HIS own comments?
How Will You Measure SCA’s
Performance After Transition?
A
business can measure performance by:
Its percentage increase in sale, an
increase in profit, a cost reduction, its return-on-assets, its
return-on-equity, etc.
As a non-profit entity, other than lowering costs, none
of these business metrics are particularly suitable for SCA.
What
performance goals will you set and how will progress toward those goals be
measured?
On April 1, 2017, you will look back and say: “Transition was a
success(failure) because….?
TODAY
Where is Mr Quinn's outline of how he will evaluate
employee performance?
Especially in the discovery that $1,500,000 of budgeted
reserve projects seem to be deferred?
Also, if there is a difference between a for-profit and not-for-profit organization, what was the purpose of employing a Chief Financial Officer and paying that individual close to $200,000 per year?
How has he influence lowering costs?
What is the Future Role of
SCA’s Finance Committee?
Should
the Finance Committee be an independent body like SCA’s Audit Committee,
providing independent analysis and opinions to the SCA’s community?
Or, should
the Finance Committee remain under the control of SCA’s board?
(Unfortunately, to the detriment to the community, the FC’s
original, useful and insightful work is often suppressed, censured, trashed
and/or ignored by SCA’s board).
TODAY
What has he done to increase the input by the SCA finance
committee?
Why hasn't he addressed the current insurance crisis that
exists?
Did SCA have Surplus
Cash on 12/31/15?
In the
three years from 12/31/12 to 12/31/15, SCA’s year-end cash balance has doubled
from $1,334,000 to $2,726,000.
This is an increase of $1,392,000, or nearly
$195/home.
How has SCA changed since 2012 so that SCA now requires twice as
much cash-on-hand?
TODAY
Now as the Association Treasurer, perhaps he might answer his
own question ???
Assuming We Can’t
Change its Use, How Much of a Subsidy Should a Restaurant Vendor Receive from
SCA?
I use
“subsidy” in the sense that a vendor pays less than SCA’s full cost to maintain
the restaurant.
I estimate SCA’s cost ranges between $160,000 to $200,000 per
year (See Note 1 below).
As I recall, Café V’s (then Vic’s) original lease was
$48,000 /year plus utilities, so they paid about $90,000/year against SCA’s
total costs.
Under my definition, Café V received a $70,000 to $110,000
“subsidy”.
Based on
our experience, it is unlikely any vendor can pay SCA’s full cost to maintain
this space.
Any future vendor will likely require either a direct and/or
indirect subsidy. Should SCA’s annual subsidy to a restaurant be:
$0 (zero)/year
$50,000/year ($7.00/home)
$100,000/year
($14.00/home)
$150,000/year
($21.00/home)
$200,000/year
($28.00/home)
$200,000+/year
For example, if SCA grants a $14/home subsidy, would a
restaurant provide residents with more than a $14/home return in
value?
If we can change the restaurant to an alternate
use, SCA’s cost to maintain that space will not drop to zero.
Any alternative
use will require a “subsidy” for utilities, reserve contributions, janitorial
services, R&M, insurance, etc.
This could easily be $80,000 to $100,000 per
year.
Note #1 SCA’s Cost to Maintain the Restaurant Space
SCA’s
accounts are not well organized, so SCA’s total cost is difficult to determine.
My estimated cost includes $80,000 to $100,000/year of Reserve Fund
contributions, $40,000/year in utilities, $15,000/year of Property Tax,
$5,000/year in Service Agreements, $20,000/year in Repairs & Maintenance
plus unknown amounts for Insurance, Janitorial Services and Other.
Even if the
Restaurant remains closed, many of these costs will
remain.
It is my humble opinion that an "on site" restaurant is an amenity that offers one more advantage over other properties.
The fact that it is ample in size with an outstanding view is an added benefit.
I have lived here since Trumpets. It appears all of our previous restaurants have missed the mark on what the residents would like what is offered.
It appears obvious that a "high end" restaurantis not wanted.
There are many of those in the city today. It seems, price, quality of food, and service are the criteria needed to be addressed.
It also seems to me the bar, with beverages priced right, is an excellent asset to this amenity.
Of course the area could be changed to just another meeting room if that is what the residents choose.
But I am sure that once the potential of a restaurant disappears, it will never return again.
So, I guess the question is, Is this an an amenity or is it just an unnecessary expense.
I think of it as an amenity.