by
- From D.L...to...Anthem Opinions
Coming from California by way of Chicago to Anthem was a major change in how a Nevada HOA operates, at least how SCA operates.
I was a Board Member and Officer of a 150+/- unit mostly absentee ownership condo association for 12 plus years.
I was also a Board Member and Officer for the HOA where we lived in CA (160 +/-) single detached homes for about 6 years.
We went thru construction defect litigation with the builder.
An aside: we were in a mediation meeting on the defect litigation when 9/11 happened and we all gathered around the secretary's radio since the lawyers office had no TV.
What an experience!!!
What I'm trying to express is that regardless of any differences between CA and NV law, the basic theory remains the same-an unconditional obligation to do good for the members not for the Association Directors or employees.
My wife and I moved into Anthem about four years ago and I had the attitude that as long as the dues were affordable and needed repairs were accomplished, I could let the HOA run as it was, necessary WITHOUT sticking my nose into the situation.
After hearing that dues were increasing while there was lots of money left over, I began to rethink my opinion.
I was able to attend the Finance Committee meeting where they discussed "hiding" more money instead of even considering a refund to the members, and I was outraged that nothing was going to change their minds.
In my day they would have been terminated from the committee for gross stupidity.
So after this long diatribe, I am offering my knowledge and experience to hopefully change a few decisions about reserves.
My physical abilities "ain't so hot", but my brain and sense of being still can recognize right from wrong.
The HOA needs new blood. - From Barbara Sidary...to...Anthem Opinions
I loved your quotes.
Amazing what a candidate will say and then not do.
I have had many people that have read your blog and come up to me and commented.
Your blog is actually the best and most truthful.
You are to be congratulated. - Thanks Barbara,
It means a lot, but what means the most is that people like you will take the time to write comments that are intelligent, well thought out, and can be understood by most people, unlike those elsewhere that only have the ability to call individuals names, but don't have the courage to even use their own name when they do.
If only those board members would realize that proper communication (in English) explaining their actions would go so far to enhance their credibility !
But let's give some credit to Carl Weinstein.
He listened and tried to get you some kind of explanation.
None of the others bothered despite their "campaign promises" which were obviously made to merely get elected.
And the other blogs who endorsed any or all of them, should have the courage to admit they recommended choices that were terrible errors in judgment....
...and that their readers should realize that their credibility is only as good as the results produced by their recommendations.
You are the one to be congratulated, not me.
You opened a "wound" that both the board and community never realized how badly was "bleeding".
Once again, we can see the frustration from members of our community and their reaction to Barbara’s letter.
So what do we do?
Many just put a comment on the blog saying I agree. Why can't the board be open and run this association like a business?
Many add a few points and post their short comments to the blog for others to see.
It appears to have little effect unless those who are concerned will barrage Board Members with their concerns.
Anthem Opinions offers the email addresses of ALL board members to anyone that is interested.
I would suggest the following.
1. Write your comments and questions to every board member.
2. Ask for a personal reply since the board is suppose to represent the community.
3. If they do not answer in a timely manner, RESEND your comments to them and mark the comment 2ND REQUEST.
4. If any of them do not answer you consider sending additional requests.
5. Attend board meetings to repeat your comments and ask for specific response. Tell them in public that they have not answered you.
When we do not attend meetings, we are giving the board permission to ignore our requests and go on doing what they have been doing.