by
Remember that public apathy is the mother’s milk of bad government.
If you live away from SCA for a few months of the year, change your mailing address before you leave town and change it back to your local address when you return.
Looking at Sun City Anthem through the eyes of its independent minded resident community.
From Robert Nusser...to...Anthem Opinions
I agree with Mr. Mayfield that there is an embarrassing lack of community involvement; he blames it on apathy.
But the BIG question is WHY did the apathy develop in the first place?
In My Humble Opinion - the apathy is the result of residents' DISGUST with past and present HOA Boards and their governance.
In my "informal survey" of neighbors asking if they voted, the overall attitude is "Why bother - things never change around here"
Unfortunately they do change - usually for the worse.
From Don Schramski...former member of the Sun City Anthem Board of Directors...to...Anthem Opinions
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with Mr. Nusser, or to those who believe as he does about WHY the apathy exists here at SCA.
I believe the apathy began early in life for very many of our homeowners, and is simply manifested here because it's easier to use an excuse to cop out than to be involved.
Past and present Boards made mistakes, sure, but, in my experience, they were always attempting to govern our association as best they could; most of the time, in spite of the constant criticism from those members who thought they knew better, but were just not motivated to either discover the real truth, or get involved.
There are too many talented homeowners who rely on the blogs for local information, and use the excuse “things never change” rather than exert any effort to lead rather than follow.
And, I certainly disagree the governance and livability of SCA is getting worse.
We enjoy a lifestyle and environment that is the envy of many homeowners in other HOA's, so why is it necessary to dis management and the Board at every juncture?
Negativism breeds negativism.
If each member would thank our Committee members, Board members and management for their service regularly, our community would be an even better place to live.
Don,
Many of the mistakes made by past boards were made out of sheer ignorance and lack of common sense, by individuals who had literally no relevant experience in a number of areas.
A perfect case in point is a Board granting a $40,000 loan to a restaurant occupant who was first unable to obtain funds from any financial institution, yet the Board on which you were a part of, granted, BELOW PRIME INTEREST RATES, following his defaulting in rent and utility payments again and again.
Of course, we never saw of dime of that money, did we?
Then...because you believed an attorney that the guy would sue SCA, you let him "off the hook" with a simple eviction without pursuing the funds.
Common sense from any experience person in the business or for that matter, a 2nd grade education, would have said to themselves, "If a guy can't pay his rent, how is he going to come up with money to pay a lawyer $300-$500 per hour to sue us?"
That...was a no brainer, something that cost residents BIG BUCKS as a result of LACK OF COMMON SENSE and/or RELEVANT EXPERIENCE.
How many times did you, as a board member, pick up the phone and ask a competent and experienced INDEPENDENT resident of the community who was not a member of any formal committee this simple question:
"If you were me, what would you do?"
OR
"Is there something we missed in our thought process?"
...when it came to controversial matters?
Mistakes are mistakes, but when you don't seek advice from those who "have been there" and instead rely on a select group with limited experience, let's just say....you shouldn't be surprised when things go south.
...and...as we all know...
THEY DID.
I agree with Mr. Mayfield that there is an embarrassing lack of community involvement; he blames it on apathy.
But the BIG question is WHY did the apathy develop in the first place?
In My Humble Opinion - the apathy is the result of residents' DISGUST with past and present HOA Boards and their governance.
In my "informal survey" of neighbors asking if they voted, the overall attitude is "Why bother - things never change around here"
Unfortunately they do change - usually for the worse.
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with Mr. Nusser, or to those who believe as he does about WHY the apathy exists here at SCA.
I believe the apathy began early in life for very many of our homeowners, and is simply manifested here because it's easier to use an excuse to cop out than to be involved.
Past and present Boards made mistakes, sure, but, in my experience, they were always attempting to govern our association as best they could; most of the time, in spite of the constant criticism from those members who thought they knew better, but were just not motivated to either discover the real truth, or get involved.
There are too many talented homeowners who rely on the blogs for local information, and use the excuse “things never change” rather than exert any effort to lead rather than follow.
And, I certainly disagree the governance and livability of SCA is getting worse.
We enjoy a lifestyle and environment that is the envy of many homeowners in other HOA's, so why is it necessary to dis management and the Board at every juncture?
Negativism breeds negativism.
If each member would thank our Committee members, Board members and management for their service regularly, our community would be an even better place to live.
Many of the mistakes made by past boards were made out of sheer ignorance and lack of common sense, by individuals who had literally no relevant experience in a number of areas.
A perfect case in point is a Board granting a $40,000 loan to a restaurant occupant who was first unable to obtain funds from any financial institution, yet the Board on which you were a part of, granted, BELOW PRIME INTEREST RATES, following his defaulting in rent and utility payments again and again.
Of course, we never saw of dime of that money, did we?
Then...because you believed an attorney that the guy would sue SCA, you let him "off the hook" with a simple eviction without pursuing the funds.
Common sense from any experienced person in the business world or for that matter, a 2nd grade education, would have said to themselves, "If a guy can't pay his rent, how is he going to come up with money to pay a lawyer $300-$500 per hour to sue us?"
That...was a no brainer, something that cost residents BIG BUCKS as a result of LACK OF COMMON SENSE and/or RELEVANT EXPERIENCE.
How many times did you, as a board member, pick up the phone and ask a competent and experienced INDEPENDENT resident of the community who was not a member of any formal committee this simple question:
"If you were me, what would you do?"
OR
"Is there something we missed in our thought process?"
...when it came to controversial matters?
Mistakes are mistakes, but when you don't seek advice from those who "have been there" and instead rely on a select group with limited experience, let's just say....you shouldn't be surprised when things go south.
...and...as we all know...
THEY DID.