We fully support the Removal
election.
Despite our dedicated volunteers being subjected to verbal
abuse and derogatory commentary from a number of individuals opposing the
removal...
...their belief in "bettering the system" drove them to collect the many
petition signatures needed for the removal election to proceed.
They, unlike the opponents who collected large
sums to send a letter to each Sun City Anthem home, believed in a
cause...
...literally "walked" the "walk" while
opponents arguments were centered on a blogger, his derogatory comments toward
any who are in favor of the removal, and money !
Our volunteers do not, and will not "buy" the
conscience of a community through the collection of funds in order to mail each
resident a letter, distorting so many facts in the
process.
If this is the manner in which the opponents choose to prevail, so be it.
We will not join them in such activity.
If this is the manner in which the opponents choose to prevail, so be it.
We will not join them in such activity.
Instead, we asking you to examine this series of
four articles with an open mind to common sense.
Keep in mind, we have NO DESIRE of obtaining any
power. They do.
We have one objective; a harmonious community where "the golden rule" is
the unofficial "law of the land".
Because we will not solicit funds, we are asking
you to forward these articles to your neighbors and friends for examination, urging them to contact Anthem Opinions for any questions they might
have.
Accordingly we will look closely at the letter
sent from an organization named "OSCAR",championed by blogger, David Berman, and
discuss the many untruths included in that
correspondence.
With all that in mind...
OSCAR
and
David
Berman
Frauds that Require
Exposure
(Part One of Four)
This letter is so full of misleading and false statements, it's difficult to believe that any thinking person, including the named former board members, would even allow their names to be associated with it.
But...
...as our original article brought out the facts about the actions of many of those former members of the Sun City Anthem Board...NONE OF WHICH CAN BE DISPUTED, and I might add, ARE NEVER PUBLISHED BY DAVID BERMAN, the propaganda goes on to maintain a system in which all of them were an active part.
Let's look closely at the OSCAR letter and literally "take it apart."
This is the first of a four part series of articles that address the FRAUD being perpetrated by the parties who oppose the Removal of the above named members of the Sun City Anthem Board.
On the first page of the “OSCAR” letter, the letter states:
“The Directors have not been accused of any crimes or
malfeasance.”
A number have already been assigned Nevada Real Estate Division investigators by the Ombudsman, a man named Charvez Foger.
The letter goes on to say:
“Removal proponents are putting our wonderful community
through an expensive, divisive and unnecessary election.”
This is partially correct.
We do live in a wonderful community and those who vote for the removal of these 4 board members want to keep it that way.
As far as divisive goes, Sandy Seddon, the Sun City Anthem General Manager, and the 4 board members to be recalled, have done more to divide this community than anyone can imagine.
The removal petitions and "no confidence" petitions against them were substantial, no matter how trivialized opponents have made them appear.
One cannot deny that they were completed despite the following actions, some of which have been the subject of FORMAL COMPLAINTS that the OSCAR letter has denied AND ARE PART OF AN ACTIVE INVESTIGATION by the Nevada Real Estate Division.
a. An eblast on Sun City Anthem letterhead by an officer of the Sun City Anthem Board of Directors, intended to interfere with those attempting to obtain signed removal petitions.
b. At the sanctioning of the Community Association Manager and General Manager, an email was sent by the Association Activities Director during normal business hours to the Presidents of all Sun City Anthem Clubs, urging them to contact their members to oppose the removal, a violation of Sun City Anthem CCRs and Nevada law in an attempt to influence the removal election.
c. Twice being denied equal time by the Sun City Anthem Board and General Manager to refute the above information provided in that eblast, a violation of Nevada law, and also the subject of multiple formal complaints against the Board, General Manager, and Community Association Manager.
d. A publicly posted document on an official Sun City Anthem Bulletin Board by a Sun City Anthem Board member which clearly expressed opposition to the petition gathering, another violation of Nevada law, and also the subject of multiple formal complaints.
e. The illegal removal of Director, Nona Tobin, violating her rights to a hearing by the Nevada Real Estate Division, to which a special investigator has also been assigned.
Keep in mind that despite the above activity intended to harm those who were seeking petitions, the necessary number were obtained to go forth with official removal of three of the directors, with the fourth under review by the Ombudsman.
Tomorrow: Part
Two
Got a comment?
Send it to us at:
Thinking its a big mistake to not get a Vote Yes letter out to the community.
We, like probably most people, have been forwarding your blog to friends regularly, but in speaking to people. In various clubs have found many who have never heard of your blog or have any idea what the recall is about.
Thinking that number could be hundreds or thousands if you consider how many residents never use the facilities or interact with those of us that do.
And if all they ever see is a Vote No letter and then a ballot comes in the mail, guessing there is a good chance that if they vote, it will be a no.
Assuming you have no mass email access like when they do the e-blasts?
Sure hoping we win, but feeling nervous about it.
Should we, the ones who try so hard for honesty, be forced to "compete" financially in order to have an honest system of governance?
Asking people for money is abhorrent in a community homeowners association.
We are supposed to be neighbors and have a "one for all and all for one" attitude, not BUY influence.
This entire election process is lopsided and unfair.
Want to review the Burch ballots that allowed him to fall within 2 votes of elective removal..you know, the announcement that was made a couple of days ago?
No problem, use a Document Request Form and wait 21 days to get a response.
Oh gee, that 21 days would take it past the deadline for the election wouldn't it?
Think that wasn't intentional on the part of THE CORRUPT BUNCH?
Even the ballots being sent the way they are, is a joke.
Sending them to a high priced outside CPA, and "hoping" they will count.
There is no checks and balance system in place.
According to the "stacked deck", the ballots will have to have been received by the CPA firm by 5:00pm on Thursday, October 26th.
They will not even be counted unless they have a minimum of 2,501 received.
So, what's to say that a number of them might "accidentally" fall in a garbage can if the number is close to the 2,501 ?
Nothing...no fail safe security, and all up to THEM, a firm hired by THOSE WHO WANT THE REMOVAL TO FAIL.
They could have done it in a manner that would have been fair to all sides, but doing it the way they are, more than proves how corrupt these individuals are to create a "stacked" election process.
And the removal opponents blame us for the high cost...
...the high cost they spent to make sure they "would play with a deck of 51 cards".
Anyone still believe this "system" is on the up and up?