Many of our readers are now well aware of the "infamous" Robert
N.
Robert is the reader who decided "enough was enough" about Sun
City Anthem spending habits and relentlessly pursued obtaining a number of
expense items that were authorized by current president, Bella Meese, and paid for by our current Board Treasurer,
Tom Nissen, using association
funds, despite his being required to complete what appeared to be an
illegal document to obtain it by current Community Association Manager, Lori
Martin.
Well...Robert has more....this time he went to the Sun City
Anthem Volunteer luncheon and made a few observations we thought we would share
with our readers.
Sun City Anthem Volunteer
Luncheon
A Reader Speaks Out Following the
Event
I happen to be one of the many faceless volunteers who
donate a portion of his or her time trying to make Sun City Anthem a nicer,
safer place to live. I, like everyone else, do this without an expectation of
accolades or remuneration.
I do it because, well, “Why
Not?” I live here just like you do.
My organization holds an annual, members-only “appreciation breakfast” at Buckman's Grill, and we are also treated to the annual
“Volunteer Appreciation Luncheon” which was held (again) this year at the M
Casino.
Now, don’t get me wrong:
I appreciate the fact that the luncheon is actually
held as a token of appreciation for the SCA Volunteers – and I am NOT “looking a
gift horse in the mouth”…..so...
...memo to any alternate
blogger attempting to increase his waning or non-existent testosterone level by
twisting my thoughts with scurrilous and libelous comments – put a sock in it.
BUT
I was emailed a confirmation for the M Casino luncheon
the other day, and was absolutely shocked when I read through it.
The confirmation included the menu that indicated
the choice of Chicken or
Salmon, vegetable, ice
tea and water (what happen to those $3 soft
drinks?), and cookies.
(There was also Passover and Vegetarian options).
Further reading indicated that IF you wanted to bring
a guest the cost would be $44.
Forty-Four Dollars ($44)!!!!
Anyone who has ever eaten at a restaurant knows that
the cheapest items on the menu are usually chicken or salmon dishes (yeah, yeah
– and also pasta dishes).
$44 is MORE
than you would spend at the M’s Anthony’s Prime Steak &
Seafood Restaurant
If you look at that expensive restaurant's actual
dinner menu...
It includes:
Scottish Salmon, cauliflower puree, kumquat marmalade, poached
beets
$32
Roasted Chicken, green beans, baby artichokes, oven dried tomato, kalamata olives, pan juice
$30
OK, those
prices don't include dessert, but even if you add the approximate cost of $9,
that's still below the $44 spent, remember we are talking about comparing things
to one of the more exclusive places in our city.
I attended the luncheon on April 29.
The meal consisted of a small thigh/leg from a
capon-size chicken, some rice, and some mixed vegetables.
Yes, there were the obligatory butter & rolls, ice tea, water,
coffee, and a desert.
When people asked for the ‘salmon
option’ they were informed “only chicken” –
the salmon option had suddenly disappeared.
I cannot report on the Passover or Vegetarian options as
neither I (nor anyone at my table) selected one of those
meals.
The main course was preceded by a small
salad; each table received a sparse amount of salad
dressing –
...when my table asked the
waitress to replenish the dressing she informed us that she would have to ‘hunt
around’ because they only allocated a certain amount for each table!
(keep that $44 per head in mind).
The last time I consumed a meal of this magnitude was on
United Airlines (when they still served you food on a
plane).
In this era of fiscal prudence and looking ahead to what
could be a financial catastrophe for SCA residents once the TRUE cost of the
Liberty Center repair is finalized, I certainly hope that the Guest fee did NOT
reflect the cost-per-head of the Volunteers attending the luncheon.
The April issue of our Spirit magazine lists approximately
700 volunteers that are being ‘honored’, and all would be eligible to attend the
luncheon.
700 Volunteers X
$44
=
$30,800
Even if only half attended , the tab would be close to
$16,000.
Who would like to bet that it
would have been FAR LESS EXPENSIVE to utilize Hanneman Hall and an outside
cater?
Of course, that would negate any possibility of Comp
Points being awarded to anyone’s Player’s Card, wouldn't it
!!!!
Yes, there was some entertainment, and, yes, the two
singers had excellent voices…but it was announced that they have up-coming
performances at the Anthem Center, so I couldn’t help but think their
performances were basically promotions for the future shows.
I tend to doubt that they were paid thousands of
dollars – if they were paid at all.
The big winner was the M
Casino (the House always wins).
The big loser was our SCA bank
balance.
So, in closing, I again emphasize that I
certainly appreciate the efforts being made to recognize the SCA Volunteers.
One of the side-benefits of our many
volunteer organizations is to keep our HOA fees
low.
For example, it has been estimated that
our Community Patrol saves SCA $500,000 - $1,000,000 per year when it eliminates
the necessity of hiring a private security
company.
So – memo to the SCA Board of
Directors:
The volunteers are trying to save the community
money.
How about you doing
the same?
Robert
N.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Did you attend the Volunteer luncheon? If so, what was your experience?
Should it have been held at the M Resort or should we have utilized our own facilities as a cost saving measure?
Got a comment on Robert N's critique?
Send it to:
No comments:
Post a Comment