Sun
City Anthem
Board
Book Anti-Bullying Proposed Resolution
We
previously announced that The Sun City Anthem Board of Directors
would address a "bullying" policy for the residents of Sun
City Anthem.
We
were able to find a SAMPLE PROPOSED Board Resolution regarding that
matter which will
be discussed at the May 24th Board Book Meeting to be held in
the Delaware Room of Anthem Center at 9:30 am.
Note...THIS
IS NOT FINAL...THIS
IS MERELY A PROPOSAL which MAY or MAY NOT BE ACTED UPON at
the Board Meeting on Thursday, May 26th at 1:30pm in Freedom Hall.
We
at Anthem Opinions STRONGLY ADVOCATE our association directors
passing this ANTI-BULLY policy.
If
you are in favor of its passage, PLEASE
send emails to EACH AND EVERY BOARD MEMBER AT YOUR EARLIEST
OPPORTUNITY.
We
have established a special "Information Page" entitled "Sun
City Anthem Board of Directors Information"
as follows:
By
clicking on this link, you can obtain each specific Board member's
email address in order to send them your opinion on passage of this
Association Policy.
Here
is the proposed Resolution that has been stated on the official Board
Book Agenda:
SUN
CITY ANTHEM COMMUNITY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RESOLUTION
RE: BULLYING
AS A VIOLATION OF NUISANCE COVENANT
WHEREAS,
______________ Homeowners Association (the “Association”) is a
Nevada nonprofit corporation governed by the laws of the State of
Nevada, including Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) Chapter 116,
which governs common-interest communities;
WHEREAS,
NRS 116.3102(1) (a) provides that an association may “adopt and
amend rules and regulations”;
WHEREAS,
Article __, Section ___ of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for __________ (the
“Declaration”) empowers the Board, acting on behalf of the
Association, to adopt, amend, repeal and/or enforce reasonable
and
uniformly applied Rules and Regulations.
WHEREAS,
NRS 116.049(3) defines an association’s governing documents to
include its Rules;
WHEREAS,
NRS 116.3102(1) (m) provides that an association “may impose
reasonable fines for violations of the governing documents” of the
Association;
WHEREAS,
NRS 116.31031(1) provides that the Board may impose fines and
sanctions against a “unit’s owner or tenant or an invitee of a
unit’s owner or tenant” for violations of the Association’s
governing documents;
WHEREAS,
Section 1 of Assembly Bill 395 known as the “Anti-Bullying Bill,
amends NRS 116 by adding NRS 116.31184, which states the following:
A
community manager, an agent or employee of the community manager,a
member of the executive board, an officer, employee or agent of an
association, a unit’s owner or guest or tenant of a unit’s owner
shall not willfully and without legal authority threaten, harass or
otherwise engage in an course of conduct against any other person who
is the community manager of his or her common-interest community or
an agent or employee of that community manager, a member of the
executive board of his or her association, an officer, employee or
agent of his or her association, another unit’s owner in his or her
common-interest community or a guest or tenant of a unit’s owner in
his or her common interest community which:
a)
Causes harm or serious emotional distress, or the
reasonable apprehension thereof, to that person; or
b)
Creates a hostile environment for that person.
2
WHEREAS, Article __, Section __ of the Declaration, governs nuisances
within ________________ and reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
INSERT
NUISANCE PROVISION FROM DECLARATION
WHEREAS,
the Board desires to adopt a Rule clarifying the Association’s
interpretation of Article __, Section __ (nuisance) of the
Declaration and incorporating within its definition the Anti-Bullying
provision set forth in NRS 116.31184.
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors hereby adopts
the following Rule:
An
officer or director of the Association, Owner, tenant, or guest of
an Owner or tenant shall not willfully and without legal authority
threaten, harass or otherwise engage in a course of conduct
against any other person who is the community manager or an agent or
employee of that community manager, an officer, director, employee
or agent of the Association, another Owner, tenant or a guest of
an Owner or tenant which:
(a) causes harm or serious emotional
distress, or the reasonable apprehension thereof, to that person;
or
(b) creates a hostile environment for that person.
Such
conduct shall be deemed to be “noxious or offensive activity”
that creates an “unreasonable annoyance or nuisance,” and as
such is a violation of Article __, Section __ of the Declaration.
3. After
notice and a hearing, as required by the Association’s
governing
documents and NRS 116, anyone violating the
above-referenced Rule may be sanctioned as follows:
(a) imposition
of fines, consistent with the Association’s Fine Policy and
Procedure;
(b) suspension
of voting privileges;
(c) suspension
of the right to use the Association’s Common
Elements.
DATED
this _______ day of _________, 201_
___________________________
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
By:
____________________________
President
By:
____________________________
Treasurer
By:
____________________________
Secretary
By:
____________________________
Director
By:
____________________________
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Stop
Cyber-Bullying
Cyber-bullying is
the act of harming or harassing via information technology networks
in a repeated and deliberate manner.
According
to U.S. Legal Definitions, "cyber-bullying could be limited to
posting rumors or gossips about a person in the internet bringing
about hatred in other’s minds; or it may go to the extent of
personally identifying victims and publishing materials severely
defaming and humiliating them.
Won't
you take a moment to tell our Board how important this is to the
well-being of our community?
Thank
you.
Anthem
Opinions Administration
General manager, Sandy Seddon, began the discussion and stated that the association attorney RECOMMENDED that such a policy be adopted by our association; however, that recommendation seems to have been rejected by 5 of the 6 board members present, with only director Carl Weinstein, supporting the measure.
Though absent due to impending surgery, director Jim Mayfield would have also supported the anti-bully measure.
What now?
Probably more unchecked "cyber-bullying" by specific blogs; however, we pledge NOT to follow suit no matter HOW MUCH ABUSE we, or other residents, will probably sustain as a result of a board refusing to acknowledge a serious association problem, much less address solving it.
While others seem to relish in "gutter" rhetoric, we will never join in any such activity.
Why?
Because looking in the mirror and liking what we see, will always be more important than lowering ourselves to such a level.
We tried...as did a new GM and and association attorney.